[phenixbb] R-free was improved, however, “Temp. fact. variance analysis” in “Validation” tool of COOT was worsened.

Pavel Afonine pafonine at lbl.gov
Thu Nov 8 06:03:20 PST 2018

Hi Manami,

I think this is too little information to be able to provide meaningful 
comments.. Can you please send me models that you compare, and also tell 
which one you think is better and why? Also, send the data so that I can 
see overall picture. Then I might be able to say more.


On 11/8/18 21:10, Manami Torimoto wrote:
> Dear all,
> By phenix.refine, I attempted  to refine one molecule of protein.
> R-free was improved in certain wxc by setting the weight wxu manually, 
> however, the results of “Temp. fact. variance analysis” in 
> “Validation” tool of COOT was worsened.
> Why did such a thing happen?
> Thank you.
> Manami
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20181108/6d24faec/attachment.htm>

More information about the phenixbb mailing list