[phenixbb] RMS angles and comprehensive validation in phenix

Pavel Afonine pafonine at lbl.gov
Thu Sep 18 23:57:30 PDT 2014


if you make sure these values are not caused by a handful of atoms that 
flew a distance apart for whatever reason then values like ok to me. 
This is why looking at a histogram of deviations (bond, angles etc) is 
way more useful than looking at just one number!


On 9/18/14 1:32 PM, C wrote:
> Hi,
> Refining using phenix I find the RMS angle drifting towards 2.3-2.7 
> range when validating the resulting structure.
> These are high resolution structures and I was wondering if someone 
> could comment on whether 2.3-2.7 values are worrisome?
> Thank you

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20140918/bad083d8/attachment.htm>

More information about the phenixbb mailing list