[phenixbb] RMS angles and comprehensive validation in phenix
pafonine at lbl.gov
Thu Sep 18 23:57:30 PDT 2014
if you make sure these values are not caused by a handful of atoms that
flew a distance apart for whatever reason then values like ok to me.
This is why looking at a histogram of deviations (bond, angles etc) is
way more useful than looking at just one number!
On 9/18/14 1:32 PM, C wrote:
> Refining using phenix I find the RMS angle drifting towards 2.3-2.7
> range when validating the resulting structure.
> These are high resolution structures and I was wondering if someone
> could comment on whether 2.3-2.7 values are worrisome?
> Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the phenixbb