[phenixbb] maximum allowable B-factor value
pafonine at lbl.gov
Wed Oct 27 09:45:42 PDT 2010
what is the resolution? You may want to tighten up the B-factor
refinement restraints manually, by making wxu_scale parameter smaller
(try several values until the refined B-factors "make sense" and the
R-factors are still ok). Alternatively, you may try group B-factor
refinement (again, if the resolution is low enough to make individual
B-factor refinement not favorable).
Also, the high B-factors may simply reflect the fact that those atoms do
not have a good density. In this case making the B-factors of bad atoms
to be similar to the B-factors of good atoms (by tightening the
restraints) is not a good idea.
So, as you can see there is a number of nuances that you need to consider.
On 10/27/10 11:26 AM, Christian Roth wrote:
> Dear all,
> I did a refinement run with a built in ligand. Within the ligand the B-factor
> jumps between two connected atoms from 60 up ~110, which is i think a bit too
> much. Is there a way to restrain the B-factors that they could not jump so
> much. I would accept negative difference density for the atom. Maybe the ligand
> is a bit degraded.
> Best regards
> @Pavel Tanks for your suggestions with occupancy refinement and B-factors.
More information about the phenixbb