[phenixbb] is derivative data useful for looking for the missing part of the model?

fn1 at rice.edu fn1 at rice.edu
Tue Jun 15 18:03:02 PDT 2010

Thanks so much!It looks promising.
If I have two or more derivative data and want to combine all these  
information. Can I just do MRSAD individually for each dataset, and  
combine them?

引用 Nathaniel Echols <nechols at lbl.gov>:

> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Francis E Reyes <Francis.Reyes at colorado.edu
>> wrote:
>> Using the model to find the heavy atom sites and then calculating phases on
>> those sites (without model) might help. ( I believe phenix will output a
>> phase combined map (model + experimental phases)).
> Correct, this is the default behavior if you provide a model directly to
> AutoSol (or Phaser).  There is however a semi-automatic way to use the model
> phases to find sites without biasing the experimental map; see the
> documentation here:
> https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/1.6.2-432/autosol.htm#anch126
> (The AutoBuild step is optional - you could just look at the
> density-modified map after AutoSol is done.)
> -Nat

More information about the phenixbb mailing list